 | |
| Down goes Saddam |
October 10, 2006
Dear Andy;
Objecting to my criticism (constant, I’m afraid) of George W. Bush’s so-called “war on terrorism,” you asked me what I would have done had I the responsibility post-9/11 “to protect the homeland?” The problem with the question is that I have the advantage of hindsight and would be tempted to say something like, “I sure wouldn’t have done what that idiot did!” You wouldn’t give that response much credence, would you? No, of course not.
In fact, it would be difficult for me to layout a strategy and plan for responding to 9/11 without either calling upon what I know now, or at any rate, being accused of doing so… “Easy to be a Monday morning quarterback.” In order to avoid this pitfall, I would need to move back in time a good quarter of a century to the Yom Kippur War and the ensuing oil crisis brought about by OPEC’s refusal to ship oil to countries that supported Israel in that war and trace my reasoning through our debacle in Iran in 1979 up to September 12, 2001. I would need to do that just to prove that my response to your question was based on something other than the catastrophe that Bush’s bungling has brought about.
That’s too much work. I’d rather play golf. So just let me summarize what I would have done.
I would start three thrusts simultaneously:
Set the US national security community the task of hunting down and capturing/killing the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack. Once the FBI had determined that responsibility for the attack lay with al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, I would order the DCI to track the movements of al-Qaeda leaders and order the SECDEF (and it wouldn’t be Donald mister supercilious Rumsfeld, whom I had the misfortune to run into at DIA HQ – he is in person just as much an a**hole as he seems on TV) to formulate a plan for capturing/killing them.
When it had been determined that bin Laden was in Afghanistan, I’d go after him with everything we had and, if necessary, I would pursue him into Pakistan (I would inform Musharif that we intended to do this, but wouldn’t threaten to bomb his country into the “stone age”). I would ensure that our forces pursued bin Laden and his henchmen (I would not give over the capture of bin Laden at Tora Bora to corrupt local militias!). I would ensure that I understood and approved the rules of engagement embedded in the SECDEF’s op plan and those ROEs would not condone torture.
At the same time, I would order my Secretary of State to begin assembling the best minds available throughout the U.S. and internationally and give them the job of formulating a GLOBAL STRATEGY for addressing the escalating threat from international terrorism, with a focus on Islamic extremists across the globe (including Indonesia and other regions of the world besides the Middle East). I would coordinate and cooperate with the international community and use international fora to promote a global response to terrorism. Throughout, I would make this an international problem (which, of course, it is).
Middle East policy would be a facet of this examination, including the US relationships with Israel and Saudi Arabia, among others. My intent would be to develop a comprehensive strategy that encompassed social programs, not just a military response (Patty Murray was right to suggest that Hezbollah might be doing something right in their approach to winning the hearts and minds of the Arab constituency, despite the Republican attack ads jumping all over her for doing so – IO is a key element of any comprehensive strategy).
I would promulgate the Badalamente doctrine stating that countries that sponsor terrorists who attack US interests at home or abroad will be treated as enemies of the US and will be subject to direct military reprisals – “You can’t get away with using surrogates to do your dirty work!”
I would have my cabinet assemble a team under the direction of my counterterrorism chief and in cooperation with the Director of the Department of Justice develop an updated threat matrix and examine US security vulnerabilities and develop a plan to address them, with a focus on “low hanging fruit” (fix the cockpit doors, inspect the cargo, for Christ sake!). My team would be instructed to examine any changes needed in policy/law to permit better tracking of terrorist threats and coordination between intelligence and law enforcement agencies. If I felt it necessary to infringe on civil liberties, I would explain myself to the American public and ensure my policies were constitutional and not just expedient.
Running the government would need to continue during all this and:
I would continue containment of Saddam and I would promote WMD inspections in Iraq during this time, and I would begin examining new options for dealing with the DPRK’s and Iran’s escalating nuclear weapons programs. I would work for sanctions on countries that failed to cooperate on non-proliferation.
I’d make sure that FEMA was robust and led by someone with relevant experience (not a horse show promoter – give me a break!)
I would fix Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid (means testing would be part of my strategy), and I would address the escalating cost of health care by using the leverage inherent in government purchasing of health care to pressure providers, such as pharmaceutical companies, to lower prices.
I would create a bipartisan congressional committee to address immigration reform, and campaign finance reform (I would have Jack Abramoff arrested and sent to a secret prison in Romania – Oh, I wouldn’t have any secret overseas prisons, so it would have to be Iowa).
I would NOT cut taxes (how dumb would that be?). I’d raise taxes and tell the people that if they didn’t like it, elect a Republican next time!
I would NOT immediately reorganize the intelligence community or domestic security agencies, but rather identify fixes to the communications barriers that prevented them from being as effective as they should have been. The information to do this would come from my vulnerability assessment.
Not everything I did as president would turn out as anticipated/intended, but I would take responsibility for my actions and freely admit my mistakes. I would listen to voices of reason, not attack them because their views might differ from mine. I would serve as an example to my party in the way I conducted myself on policy matters with the opposing party, promoting compromise rather than partisanship. My focus would be on doing my job to the best of my ability – not getting elected for a second term.
I would wear blue dress shirts and paisley ties.
Respectfully yours,
and etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment