Thursday, February 2, 2012

Dismal Science at the Wall Street Journal - The Equation

The Wall Street Journal becomes "Fox-ified."

A op-ed article signed by 16 scientists rejecting the need for “drastic action to decarbonize the world’s economy,” published Friday (1/27/2012) by the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal, has been widely and thoroughly fact-checked and challenged elsewhere. For example, see: Dismal Science at the Wall Street Journal - The Equation

What's happened to the good, old WSJ? Murdock's happened.
at
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

A Primer on Fossil Fuels and Their Impact on Earth's Oceans

OCEANS AND FOSSIL FUELS From the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History: Ocean [https://ocean.si.edu/conservation/gulf-oil-spill/wha...

  • Living without a Pericardium
    The Pericardium I was trying to give my heart to my cardiologist, let’s call him Dr. Sing. “Why would I want your heart?” he asked ...
  • You've been diagnosed with prostate cancer; now what?
    I am not an MD. What you read here is based on my own personal experience with prostate cancer, and how I went about deciding what to do ab...
  • The Colossal Squid
    The Colossal Squid is the biggest invertebrate on the planet. In February 2007 a female colossal squid was caught accidentally by the boat S...