We Have the Technology -- Do We Have the Political Will?

 

Discourse of Climate Delay (art by Léonard Chemineau, based on the diagram below)

 

by Jon Phillips

Commercial technologies currently exist that can transform the entire electricity generating sector. No new technology is required to take action. All that’s required is to agree and develop the practical legal basis to rapidly ramp up that transformation. Detailed studies of at least two practical approaches have already been done.

 

Transportation and land use sectors are more difficult than electricity. But parts of those sectors can already be addressed and there’s nothing in the way of moving forward except a lack of agreement to do so in legislative bodies at Federal and State levels. You don’t have to have the full solution to make enormous progress. We should make increased electrification of transportation a direct link to the electricity sector approach and get moving on that.

 

Even Germany’s ill advised approach may work out in the end. Certainly it’s better than doing nothing. In a decade or two, they’ll be in an ideal place to reverse their anti-nuclear stance and accept new and far safer technology to back a renewables rich infrastructure that they’re currently building. Then they could quickly expunge nearly all coal (they’re still using coal) and quite a bit of natural gas backing. Hydrogen production and large fuel cells are proto-existing technologies that are certainly more competitive than solar — which they’re over installing all over the place at tremendous cost.

 

Ultimately, carbon pricing is the solution and that’s a matter of law and regulations. It would immediately spur infrastructure transition (which means a huge source of labor and technical jobs that cannot be offshored). If we could make rapid progress on electricity and on electrification of the personal transportation market, plus some big mass transit markets that could use rail, that would be a great start.

 

Harder targets like air transportation and commercial trucks might resolve more easily later. Agriculture, meat production, and forestry practices require revamping. We should press hard on building codes to require more energy efficiency and installations of passive and active solar solutions that already exist.

 

Dual Axis Trackers (pv magazine)

 

Farmed solar isn’t such a great idea from a land use perspective, frankly it’s very destructive to local ecosystems of undeveloped land and even bodies of water (I’ve seen whole lakes covered in floating photovoltaic panels. It creates artificial shade that inherently alters the ecosystem. I’ve seem massive installations that are no better than clear cutting a forest — except that a forest might eventually grow back.

 

We need to be smarter about solar. For example, if there’s a decent solar resource in a given place, it should be required in building codes for roofing applications and for parking lot coverings, etc. That land is already in developed use and you’re not destroying a habitat in the boondocks. The only problem is libertarian thinking about building codes. People scream when you try to make requirements about their neighborhood.

 

Agrivoltaics is emerging as very interesting in arid & semi arid areas where solar panel performance improves with plant transpiration cooling and plants are more productive with some protection against extreme heat. And irrigation water need drops by a third to a half.

 

William F. Lamb, et al., in Global Sustainability, Vol 3, 2020

The real problem isn’t technology and know how, it’s lack of agreement to put laws and regulations in place. All of the excuses above are just a dodge to avoid even the slightest near term inconvenience of groups of individuals (same psychology as NIMBY). Human psychology is far more attuned to what will happen today and tomorrow than in decades to come. It’s that same reason people get mired in revolving credit debt. The inability to suppress the urge to seek immediate self gratification is very destructive.

Accountability for Politicization of Science? Lysenkoism in the U.S.

by Natalka Poltavka*

"Working hard will give you a good farm," USSR collective farming, 1947

It took 97 days from the outbreak of the first Covid-19 case in the U.S. to get to 1 million cases and 44 days to hit 2 million cases. Since summer we have experienced exponential growth in the number of Covid-19 cases, as more and more people seem to ignore simple public health warnings.  In November alone the U.S. added 4 million new cases, going from 10 million on November 9th, to 13 million 18 days later.  And this is before the fallout from Thanksgiving travel is felt.

This is distressing in the extreme, especially in a society where we conduct complex global stock trades, multilateral business meetings, and exchange of technical equipment with the international space station, all using complicated technology. And yet millions are unwilling to engage in life-saving behavior using the simplest techniques -- wearing masks, washing hands and social distancing. And half the population mocks those who do. How did we get here?

I keep returning to something that has been troubling me for a long while and is now disturbingly evident -- the rise of Lysenkoism in American science.  One could argue that there were disturbing signs of this in April as President Trump mocked epidemiologists and public health specialists and started to brush their recommendations aside. Then with the elevation of Dr. Scott Atlas to the WH Coronavirus task force, and kangaroo panels of doctors peddling unproven and even crackpot theories antithetical to proven and established public health practices, the rise of Lysenkoism in public health and to some degree, medical science, became more evident. Yet again I find myself asking, how could this happen here?  Most of the world's public health specialists are enacting proven methodology that many of them learned in the U.S. and U.K to combat Covid-19 and even in the face of global surges, they are having more success than in the US. These experts are bewildered by the undermining of proven public health practices and frightened when the most renowned infectious disease specialists and epidemiologists are mocked, denounced and threatened!

Nikolai Vavilov, 1933

I often think that some of the cruelest tragedies are found in Russian history, and certainly one of the bitterest ironies in recent Russian science history is the fate of Nikolai Vavilov, noted agronomist, and genetic biologist, who died of starvation in a freezing Saratov prison in January 1943.  A scientist who pioneered plant breeding to help Soviet agriculture and created a bank of seeds from around the world to foster research to produce better crop yield to feed more people in the world, starved to death, a martyr to the political takeover of science that denied Mendelian genetics and elevated a peasant "agronomist," T.D. Lysenko, who embraced long-disproven Lamarckism.  Stalin, looking for someone to blame when collectivization failed spectacularly, found Vavilov a convenient scapegoat.  Many experts like Vavilov, along with his students were persecuted, arrested or shot.  Yet they refused to yield to what was politically mandated, some of them undertaking heroic efforts to save the seed bank in Leningrad during the Siege, when starvation was rampant and rats and people were vying for food -- the cats having long ago been eaten. Vavilov's seed bank by that time had grown to over 250,000 samples.  During this purge of expertise and actual science, T.D. Lysenko rose in the institutes and academies and his pseudo-scientific theories prevailed.  This set back Soviet genetics, agronomy and biology for a generation. And yet, Lysenko's popularity in Russia is "currently enjoying a revival in his homeland, where anti-American sentiment runs strong."

And so now here we are with Trump, blaming public health and infectious disease specialists for the damaged economy, yet offering no coherent plan to bring the numbers down and give us a fighting chance. By opening too soon, he ironically prevented the economy from rebounding.  Instead he and his Atlas acolytes undertook and expanded an insidious campaign of disinformation that is killing hundreds of thousands of Americans.  While millions eventually died from Stalin's repression of agriculture, biology and science, death took its toll over time, except for the immediate repercussions that Vavilov himself suffered.

Scott Atlas resigns from Trump Coronavirus Taskforce, Dec 1, 2020

The current pandemic and its unfettered surge in the U.S. due to willful denial of science, is having a more immediate effect -- hundreds of thousands have died and thousands more will die of Covid-19 by January 2021.  More despicable is that several of those preaching an anti-Public Health message -- much like Dr. Atlas himself -- are trained doctors, among them Rand Paul (a "self-certified" ophathalmologist).  This is even more damning than the misguided self-aggrandizement of a peasant Ukrainian pseudo-scientist. People are continuing to die needlessly.  And, just like the destructive impact on Soviet Science, the U.S. Public Health field and possibly nursing and medicine itself, will also suffer in the long term.  Already state public health specialists are resigning from their posts, fighting a losing battle against disinformation and increasing death threats to themselves and their families. Doctors and nurses are working around the clock to save lives of Covid victims -- many of whom deny the existence of the disease from which they are dying.

Where is the accountability for this?  For the lives that are being lost, for the grave damage dealt to what was once a crown jewel of U.S. medical expertise -- public health?  When experts like Vavilov paid with the loss of their careers or their lives, where was accountability in the USSR?  Yes, Vavilov was "rehabilitated" by the Soviets, and an institute named after him, but long after he was dead. And after Soviet biology/genetics had to make a long climb back.

When millions fall ill weekly and the death toll approaches half a million by February, and the Public Health field is decimated, will Trump, Atlas or Paul be held accountable? Or will they, like Lysenko, be admonished by scientific publications (Stanford and the Hoover Institute have distanced themselves from Atlas's positions), but serve out their days at their Institute or office or on Fox & Friends?

I thought the rise of Lysenkoism and the tragic fate of Vavilov was something unique to authoritarian regimes ruled by ideology and could not happen here.  Yet it has, with equally tragic consequences. We cannot overlook this.  This isn't a matter of disagreement over two scientific approaches.  One approach is unscientific; it has been disproven, it is wrong. Those responsible for promoting pseudo-science, conspiracy theories, or simply ignoring the worst pandemic in more than 100 years, must be held accountable.  

________________________________

'Natalka Poltavka' is a pseudonym for a long-time friend working as a foreign affairs specialist in the U.S. government. She has studied Soviet and then Russian affairs for over 4 decades.

Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941

The Japanese military launched a surprise attack on the United States Naval Base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The attack killed 2,403 U.S. personnel, including 68 civilians, and destroyed or damaged 19 U.S. Navy ships, including 8 battleships.

Overcoming the Trump Presidency Has Taken an Enormous Toll

 

I wrote a blog post in June of 2016, leading up to the Presidential Election, assessing how Donald J. Trump became the Republican candidate for President. The fact that he was elected was a shock to me -- maybe it shouldn't have been -- and it made me reassess my assumption about the character of the American people. Fundamentally, I concluded that there was no monolithic "American people," no defined American culture [outside of fast food], and no "pledge of allegiance" to equality or democracy, Alexis de Tocqueville be damned.

Trump's term in office has served as an emetic, causing the vomiting up of every despicable element of the American underbelly, including white supremacists -- one side of the "very fine people" in Charlottesville, Virginia.

 

These disaffected, under-educated, previously disorganized rabble formed an unholy alliance with the reliable single-issue voters, such as the evangelicals, whose only focus was abortion, and who ignored the homeless, the children in cages, and the "huddled masses yearning to breathe free."

They joined arms with "freedom-loving" militias from Oregon to Michigan, from “sea to shining sea.” And to the gun-rights fanatics, who failed to see in the blood-soaked schools, dance floors, festivals, football games, and streets of America any reason to limit access to lethal firearms.

Unable to divine connective tissue for their targeted misanthropy, some of the more suggestive elements of Trump’s followers found, buried within the "Deep State," an oracle, Q -- and Qanon was formed. Its conspiracy theories became so influential, and so disruptive, that even Facebook finally imposed restrictions. Still, a Qanon supporter, Marjorie Taylor Greene, won the Republican primary for Georgia's 14th Congressional District. President Trump congratulated Greene and called her “a real winner.” The FBI has labeled Qanon as a potential domestic terrorism threat.

 

And here we are, awaiting the results of the 2020 Election, in which Donald Trump, after having exhibited all the worst behaviors we had anticipated, and more, has so far amassed some 70 million votes, 7 million more than his 2016 total, and counting. Joe Biden, with over 74 million votes, has already broken Barack Obama's record vote total, and the margin with which Hillary Clinton exceeded Trump's 2016 popular vote, and yet he clings to a razor thin lead in states he needed to win the electoral college.

Trump still had a narrow path to victory, but his demands to stop counting votes [but only in states where he is ahead] are being dismissed, leaving him to fall back on law suits, which are also being dismissed. His hope to have the Supreme Court, which, with Mitch McConnell's help, he has succeeded in moving to a six to three conservative majority, seems Sisyphean.

In the end, Joe Biden won the battle for the American Presidency, but in a sense it is a Pyrrhic victory. The fight to overcome the Trump Presidency has taken an enormous toll on the vision of America as somehow “exceptional,” as somehow worthy to lead the world towards freedom and justice, worthy of emulation — an America, her good “crowned with brotherhood.”

How long will it take us to reclaim that lofty vision?

Russian Interference in America's Democracy: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

Robert Mueller testifying before Congress on Russian Interference in the 2016 election

 

YESTERDAY

The Mueller Investigation came about despite efforts by Trump to stop or impede it. The Mueller Report was released in redacted form on April 18, 2019. However, the results of the investigation were muted by a "summary" of the results presented by Attorney General William Barr, who, during a televised press conference claimed that the investigation revealed no collusion and no obstruction of justice. This was misleading with regard to collusion, and false with regard to obstruction.

The American Constitution Society (ACS) made a line-by-line comparison of Barr's summary and Mueller's findings. They concluded:

"A comparison of the report and Barr’s statements shows that Barr downplayed Mueller’s findings about Russian contacts with Trump campaign associates as well as the damning evidence of the president’s obstruction of justice that Mueller assembled."

In his report to Congress, then-special counsel Robert Mueller detailed how members of the Trump Campaign lied under questioning. Also, campaign insiders like Roger Stone, used encrypted communications to hide their actions. Further, Mueller described Trump as being guilty of the factual elements of obstruction of justice, but left it up to Congress what to do with them. The Democratic-led House Committee on the Judiciary under Jerry Nadler punted.

Trump took full advantage of Barr's cover and proclaimed himself "exonerated," and the story lost steam in the media. Interestingly, Trump was himself directly guilty of obstruction by refusing to multiple requests spanning over a year to appear in person for questioning by the Mueller team, agreeing only to answer written questions. Mueller judged Trump's written answers "inadequate." They were included in an appendix to the report. Anyone objectively interested in Trump's perfidy regarding the investigation owes it to themself to read this appendix.

TODAY

 

In mid-August of 2020, the Republican-led Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) released its own years-long report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The 966-word report in five volumes makes it abundantly clear that Russia's interference in the 2016 election was real, was aggressive, and was effective -- this was no "hoax."

The SSCI report pointed to Trump campaign coordination with Russian interference activities, including the GRU hack of the DNC servers. The SSCI report states that Roger Stone served as the go-between for the Trump campaign, including Trump himself, and WikiLeaks. It has a long section on Paul Manafort, one-time Trump campaign chairman, now serving a 6+ year prison sentence. The SSCI report states that Manafort's presence on the campaign posed “a grave counterintelligence threat,” and questions whether Manafort was actually involved in the Russian interference campaign itself. The report makes it clear that there was direct coordination between WikiLeaks and the Trump Campaign. In that the hacked material WikiLeaks fed to the Trump Campaign were provided by the Russian Military Intelligence Service, the GRU, WikiLeaks essentially served as what's known in intelligence parlance, as a GRU cutout.

It's important to understand the fundamental difference between the SSCI's investigation and that of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller. The Special Counsel conducted a criminal investigation. This is why Mueller was careful to draw a distinction between "collusion," and "conspiracy." The Special Council evaluated potential criminal conduct by the Trump Campaign according to conspiracy law (18 U.S.C § 371), because “collusion” per se is not found in U.S. Code nor in federal criminal law. The burden of proof for conspiracy used by the Special Council was that the Trump Campaign and the Russian Government had an agreement, tacit or express, on the Russian’s election interference, and more, that the parties were taking actions informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests.

The Mueller investigation identified innumerable links between the Trump Campaign and Russians possibly tied to the Russian Government (e.g., “cutouts”). People interviewed by the Special Council sometimes provided information that was false or incomplete, while others deleted relevant communications, used encrypted communications, or auto-delete features. Ultimately, the Special Counsel concluded that there was insufficient evidence in the legal sense to establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired with the Russian Government in its election interference activities.

The Senate Select Committee was not strictly bound by legal statutes. It conducted a counterintelligence investigation. Counterintelligence investigations address intelligence questions pertaining to national security threats, not merely statutorily prohibited crimes. That is why the SSCI investigation revealed a breathtaking depth and breadth of cooperation between Trump, his campaign, and the Russians that has never before been seen in the annals of presidential politics. Unfortunately, many areas of the report that could provide grater granularity are redacted, because of the classified nature of the material.

Despite countless redactions, reviewers at LAWFARE (Todd Carney, Samantha Fry, Quinta Jurecic, Jacob Schulz, Tia Sewell, Margaret Taylor, Benjamin Wittes) were able to prise from the 966 pages the following key findings with regard to "collusion:"

1. The Trump campaign and Donald Trump himself were certainly aware in real time of Russian efforts to intervene in the 2016 presidential election. The campaign had a heads-up that Russia had stolen Democratic emails. And Russian operatives sought and received a meeting with senior Trump campaign officials promising “dirt” on Trump’s opponent. As the campaign wore on, and the Russian efforts were increasingly made public, Trump personally and publicly encouraged them.
2. The Trump campaign was run for a time by a man with an ongoing business relationship with a Russian intelligence operative, to whom he gave proprietary internal polling data. 
3. The Trump campaign did not discourage Russian activity on its behalf. In fact, it sought repeatedly to coordinate its messaging around WikiLeaks releases of information. The campaign, and Trump personally, sought to contact WikiLeaks to receive information in advance about releases and may well have succeeded.
4. The campaign sought to obtain disparaging information about Hillary Clinton from actors who either were Russian operatives or it believed were Russian operatives. It did so through a number of means—some of these efforts were direct. Some were indirect. 
5. The Russian government and affiliated actors clearly regarded the Trump campaign as a prime target for influence and recruitment. Russia targeted a diverse array of people associated with Trump for contact and engagement through an astonishing variety of avenues. Some of these attempts were rebuffed. Many of them were successful. The result was a sustained degree of engagement between the campaign, and later the transition, and Russian officials and cutouts.
6. Trump’s personal and business history in Russia provided a significant opportunity for kompromat. Such material was very likely collected. There is less evidence that it was ever deployed, though Trump’s mere awareness of his vulnerability gives rise to substantial counterintelligence concerns.
7. Trump’s active pursuit of business deals in Russia while running for president and denying any such deals created significant counterintelligence risk.
8. Trump’s campaign, and later transition, were filled with a remarkable number of people who had secret interactions with Russian actors, about which they lied either in real time or in retrospect.
9. All of this activity, particularly cumulatively, amounts to a grave set of counterintelligence concerns, in which any number of Trump campaign figures—including the candidate himself—exposed themselves to potential coercive pressure from an adversary foreign actor. 
10. Trump to this day will not criticize Russian President Vladimir Putin or acknowledge unambiguously Russian intervention in the 2016 election.   
    

The main body of the SSCI report concludes,

"(U) It is our conclusion, based on the facts detailed in the Committee's Report, that the Russian intelligence services' assault on the integrity of the 2016 U.S. electoral process and Trump and his associates' participation in and enabling of this Russian activity, represents one of the single most grave counterintelligence threats to American national security in the modem era."

TOMORROW

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has already altered what we buy, what we view, and what we do. AI is integral to the social media platforms to which we've become addicted -- AI establishes the formula for creating that addiction. AI helps print media decide what to include in its hard copy versus digital edition, and what its price points should be, as well as how to leverage its content on social media. As we enter the post-Information Age, AI will be used in conjunction with"Big Data" to disseminate disinformation to a targeted audience of confounded users.

Facebook, Inc. includes in its arsenal: Facebook Messenger, Facebook Watch, and  Facebook Portal, as well as Instagram, WhatsApp, Oculus VR, Giphy, Mapillary, and 9.9% of Jio Platforms. Facebook, Messenger, WahtsApp, and Instagram are ranked 1 through 4 of the world's most downloaded apps.

Now Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is moving to make Facebook, Inc's portfolio of social media apps interoperable. According to Zuckerberg's "A Privacy-Focused Vision for Social Networking," The Facebook, Inc. portofolio will, "give people a choice so they can reach their friends across these networks from whichever app they prefer." This means one could post their grandkid's picture in Facebook and text it to their mistress using an encrypted message in WhatsApp. And despite Zuckerberg's waxing poetic about privacy, secure data storage, and other user benefits, it also means easier collection, codification, and classification of big data -- the better to sell you with.

China's 19-year-old Go player Ke Jie prepares to make a move during the second match against Google's artificial intelligence programme AlphaGo in Wuzhen, eastern China's Zhejiang province, on May 25, 2017. (STR/AFP/Getty Images)

Zuckerberg wrote his manifesto in March 2019, and while he's been bringing it to fruition, researchers in artificial intelligence have been advancing the state of the art such that a machine, AlphaGo, has mastered the ancient and long considered impossibly complex game of Go. Now the researchers at DeepMind have mastered one of the most challenging real-time strategy games of all time, StarCraft II.

Google acquired DeepMind in 2014 for a reported $500 million. In 2016, DeepMind announced that Google had found a use for its AI technology in its enormous data centers. The only thing left for DeepMind to master is the means to defeat hackers determined to hold the computer systems and data of financial institutions, insurance companies, and even hospitals hostage using ransomware, or sovereign adversaries using competing AI programs determined to bring down nation states -- like ours.

In China, AlphaGo was a "Sputnik moment" which helped convince the Chinese government to prioritize and dramatically increase funding for artificial intelligence. The United States has been the leader in AI, but Donald Trump's trade war with China, and xenophobic rhetoric has made the U.S. a less attractive destination for talented AI researchers, while at the same time helping China retain its AI talent.

According to Onalytica, among the "top influencers" in AI by brand, Google leads with a 25% share, followed by IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, and wait for it -- Facebook. Zuckerberg is building his business by learning everything possible about the users of Facebook, Inc., and packaging their data for the benefit of advertisers, of course, but how about for the benefit of the U.S. Census, political candidates, political parties, states, or even nation states? It's all out there for the highest bidder, and Zuckerberg has shown he has deep pockets.

AI has the potential to make America's problem of defending against interference in its democratic institutions that much more difficult. It also has the promise for aiding in that defense. The question is, what will win out, patriotism or capitalism?

Is Amy Coney Barrett an 'Orginalist' Like Her Mentor, Antonin Scalia Was Supposed to Be?

Senate Confirmation Hearings for Amy Coney Barrett, October 13, 2020

I recently completed the book, The Quartet, by Joseph J. Ellis. It is a very readable description of the parts George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, among others, played in orchestrating the creation of a nation, from a loose confederation of states whose occupants retained their suspicions and outright antipathy towards centralized control. After all, they’d just fought and died to wrest control from what they considered an overbearing a sovereign in the person of George III of Great Britain.

Ellis writes that, James Madison, in a long letter to Thomas Jefferson, “described the hybrid creature that the Constitution had created as part confederation and part nation.” Unfortunately or fortunately, depending on one’s political leaning, no one knew where the demarcation on state versus national sovereignty lay. Ellis goes on to write,

“In the long run — and this was Madison’s most creative insight — the multiple ambiguities embedded in the Constitution made it an inherently 'living' document. For it was designed not to offer clear answers to the sovereignty question (or, for that matter, to the scope of executive or judicial authority) but instead to provide a political arena in which arguments about those contested issues could continue in a deliberative fashion. The Constitution was intended less to resolve arguments than to make argument itself the solution.” Ellis goes on, “For judicial devotees of 'originalism' or 'original intent,' this should be a disarming insight, since it made the Constitution the foundation for an ever-shifting political dialogue that, like history itself, was an argument without end. Madison’s 'original intention' was to make all 'original intentions' infinitely negotiable in the future.”

I would like very much for Amy Coney Barrett to be asked a cogent question about her position on “originalism.” I doubt she would answer the question, however, even if she had a position on it. Her mentor, the late Antonin Scalia, was considered an originalist, but his rulings reflected rather a more pragmatic view of what stance would get him where he already wanted to go (see Richald L. Hasen’s new book on Scalia).

Barrett will be confirmed by the Senate, likely on a party-line vote. She will exercise an out-sized influence on future SCOTUS decisions by virtue of the Court's 6 - 3 conservative majority and the fact that other conservative judges can count on her unwavering support for a 1788-era interpretation of the Constitution.

Loren Culp -- Jay Inslee Debate Highlights Culp's Libertarian Ethos on COVID-19

Loren Culp campaigning for Governor of Washington State

  

Loren Culp's candidacy for governor gets a lot of traction here in Eastern Washington, where the libertarian ethos is as strong as cheat grass, and potentially as volatile.

Culp wants "the people" to be free to decide for themselves whether and how to deal with the deadliest pandemic in modern U.S. history. Researchers found the relative increase in mortality during the early period of the COVID-19 epidemic was "substantially greater" than the peak of the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic.

Culp mirrors the approach Donald Trump has taken to controlling COVID-19. Under the Presidents chaotic mismanagement the US continues to regularly report more than 1,000 new coronavirus deaths a day, which is one of the highest daily death rates per capita in the world. Over 212,000 of "the people" have died so far, and cases across the U.S. are once again surging as restrictions are eased.

Washington State has one of the lowest per capita rates of COVID-19 in the U.S., and according to a report from Oxfam America, no state has a better safety net for people impacted by COVID-19. But as restrictions have been eased, cases are again increasing. It's way too soon to ease restrictions, or to get complacent.

Loren Culp will continue to beat the "give me liberty or give me death drum" -- we can only hope that he's not going to lead too many of his followers to the latter outcome, and that those that do follow his lead, stay the heck away from the rest of us.

What's Left Behind After a Wildfire

Camp Wildfire, California, 2019

 

I've read a lot of Americans tweeting that "2020 sucks!" Can you blame them? They've had to deal with President Trump's continuous barrage of outrages against norms, laws, and decency, the coronavirus pandemic, and Trump's criminally negligent mismanagement of it, Black Lives Matter protests, and counter protests, a proliferation of conspiracy theories, and the coming 2020 Election, with Russian and Republican attempts to sabotage it. It's all too much to take in, let alone process.

Sandwiched between the political unrest and advancing plague threat, we experienced an unusual array of weird weather events that seemed to come and then quickly go on our daily news feed.

• A bomb cyclone hammered Newfoundland, Canada, at the beginning of the year, prompting people to ask, "What the hell's a 'bomb cyclone?" The provincial capital St. John's was buried in 30 inches of snow, its highest daily snowfall on record.
• Plumes of hot and dry air laden with dust from Africa's Sahara Desert surged as far north as parts of the U.S. Midwest, leaving Omaha, Nebraska, with a taste of desert living.
• In Florida, Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Key West set over 120 combined daily records in 2020. The state had its record hottest and second driest March dating to 1895.
• An Easter Sunday outbreak spawned a pair of EF4 tornadoes (estimated wind speeds of 166 to 200 mph) in southern Mississippi, the first multiple tornadoes ever. The next Sunday, another EF4 tornado tore through an area only 20 to 40 miles south of the previous Easter Sunday tornadoes.
• Catastrophic 2019-2020 Australian bushfires charred more than 20% of the country's forests, destroyed over 1,400 homes, and killed an estimated 1 billion animals. In January, smoke from the fires circumnavigated the globe. The smoke plume rose higher into the atmosphere than ever previously documented. 
• Lake Erie was ice free from Dec. 29 through Jan. 17 and then again for four days after Groundhog Day. The lake was ice free for the season beginning on March 10. In an average winter, Lake Erie reaches a peak of 70% ice coverage in February, and isn't ice free until late April.
• Caribou, Maine, one of the farthest-north towns in the continental U.S., was one of the hottest places east of the Mississippi River. Temperatures soared to 95 degrees on June 18, then 96 degrees the next day. On June 19, the nation's only heat advisory was in Maine.
• On June 20, the temperature in Verkhoyansk, a town in northeast Russia about 260 miles south of the Arctic coast and about 6 miles north of the Arctic Circle, topped out at over 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

Now, as the days grow short and we see September in our rear-view mirror, Mother Nature has gotten even nastier, demanding that we pay attention. With catastrophic wildfires, hurricanes, typhoons, storms, tornadoes, and these weird weather gyrations one has to ask, "What is it that Mom is trying to tell us?"

 

I discovered a poet recently, who has something to say about the catastrophic wildfires decimating California. Her name is Molly Fisk (@MollyFisk). In 2019, Fisk was named an Academy of American Poets Laureate Fellow. She currently serves as the poet laureate of Nevada County, California. This is her poem inspired by what's left behind after a wildfire, and what lives on in those who survive it.

 

Particulate Matter 

If all you counted were tires on the cars left in driveways and stranded beside the roads.
Melted dashboards and tail lights, oil pans, window glass, seat belt clasps.
The propane tanks in everyone's yards, though we didn't hear them explode.

R-13 insulation. Paint, inside and out. The liquor store's plastic letters in puddled
 colors below their charred sign. Each man-made sole of every shoe in all those closets.
The laundromat's washers' round metal doors.

But then Arco, Safeway, Walgreens, the library—everything they contained.
 How many miles of electrical wire and PVC pipe swirling into the once-blue sky:
 how many linoleum acres? Not to mention the valley oaks, the ponderosas, all the wild

hearts and all the tame, their bark and leaves and hooves and hair and bones, their final 
cries, and our neighbors: so many particular, precious, irreplaceable lives that despite
 ourselves we're inhaling.

Copyright 2018 Molly Fisk

Camp Wildfire Damage, California 2020